Tagged: movie review

Movie Thoughts: “The Frozen Ground”

It’s no great surprise to anyone who knows me, but I’m a Nicolas Cage fan.  I enjoy his work.  Sure, some of his more recent stuff hasn’t been very good overall BUT his contributions, by and large, are solid — and he hits gold more often than not.  However, this post is not about Nicolas Cage’s movie career, but, rather, some of my thoughts from watching his flick “The Frozen Ground”.

First and foremost, it was okay.  I had heard of this story before — I think I saw one of those crime TV shows about it — but, essentially, there’s a guy (played by John Cusack) who is abducting women/strippers/prostitutes and then rapes, tortures, and kills them, dumping their bodies in the wilderness of Alaska…..actually, I should just say “Alaska” — you can do the “wilderness” math on that.

As far as the movie goes, it was okay.  It wasn’t anything that really moved me or left me saying “Wow…” with a single tear rolling down my cheek afterwards; and I doubt that it made any buzz during award season.  Nic Cage was clutch, as he usually is, and Cusack played a pretty solid villain/mentally disturbed guy.  I’m not a fan of Vanessa Hudgens, though, and casting 50 Cent as the pimp was also not one that I think made a lot of sense.  I just don’t think that either Vanessa Hudgens or 50 Cent can act.

There were a few things that annoyed me in this movie: 1) the police are quick to dismiss the girl’s story (despite her clear physical evidence of surviving a torturous episode….hell, she didn’t handcuff and beat herself up);  2) Nic Cage’s movie-wife’s objection to helping out the girl and letting her stay in their house for one night; and 3) the girl constantly doing things that Nic Cage specifically told her not to do…which I allude to in my Twitter post.

1) Look, police are people, too, and so they make mistakes….but that’s a pretty big miss, in my book.  Had she strolled into the police station and made the accusation, then that’s one thing.  But to be discovered in a panic, handcuffed, clear evidence of physical trauma, and shaking uncontrollably, I’m going to err on the side that “Hey, maybe she’s not making this up…” and look into it.  They straight up dismissed the story because she’s a prostitute and the accused is an upstanding citizen.  But aren’t the weirdos and messed up people always the ones that are upstanding?  I wish that in movies they’d have that “common sense guy” in the war room to be like: “Well, we should at least look into this… I mean, clearly she didn’t handcuff and beat herself, right?”  Plus, she knew a lot about the guy and the interior of his home for someone who, using police logic, should have no business being inside of the man’s home…..since she is a prostitute and he is an upstanding citizen.  So, yeah, they really dropped the ball on that one.  The fact that she knew he had a plane should be enough to be like “Hmm….”  Unless everyone in Alaska has a plane — I’ll get to my comments on Alaska later, though — that should have been enough to raise a flag, because what random prostitute would know that some guy had a plane and be able to describe it in detail??? That annoyed me that they dismissed her story right away.

2) It annoyed me that Nic Cage’s movie-wife objected to letting the girl stay at their place for the night. For ONE night (or so Nic Cage pleaded).  Sure, being in the midst of a move and having quit your job because your bad-ass husband (Nic Cage) had put in his paperwork to transfer (or something)….but it’s been two weeks and you still haven’t moved…..can be tough and stressful, I get it.  But, you know what else is stressful? TRACKING DOWN A MAN WHO IS MURDERING DOZENS OF WOMEN AND DUMPING THEIR BODIES IN THE WILDERNESS!!!  AND then you FINALLY have the one person who can close the case — the ONLY woman who managed to escape from the murderer — literally in your house, under your protection…..and your wife says “no dice”.  WHAT?!?!  If anyone can get behind what Nic Cage is trying to do and just how VITAL this girl is to his case, shouldn’t it be a woman? Especially, since his wife sort of met the physical characteristics of what this bastard was attracted to….. AND she’s the mother of TWO DAUGHTERS!!! C’mon!! This should have been a lay-up like “Oh definitely my poor girl! Come in and be safe!”  Nope – instead, she fights with Nic Cage over the girl staying in their home FOR ONE NIGHT, and not even in that polite manner, either, of taking it to the bedroom or someone private — she gets into it with him right there in the kitchen where everyone in the house…. especially the now-feeling-terribly-unwanted girl…..can hear.  So, of course the girl then leaves the house and, having no where to go, almost gets re-abducted and killed.  Which brings me to my next point of annoyance….

3) When Nic Cage tells you to do something – you do it.  He’s never wrong.  When the girl was hospitalized following an overdose, Nic Cage is there for her with her safety being his top priority — as she is the only chance he has to put this sick bastard away.  But she resists and says she needs to go to her pimp’s place to get her stuff, but Nic Cage is like “No way.  Are you insane?? Being on the street is how you got into this situation in the first place.  No, stay put and I’ll go get your stuff.” [or, at least, that is what he should have said to her]  She doesn’t listen.  That night she sneaks out of the hospital and goes back to the pimp hideout where she finds out that, oh, some guy is looking for her…. oh, and her pimp is going to hand her over to be killed in order to erase a sizable debt that he has….. it annoyed me.  Just stay in the hospital.  You have a relatively comfy bed, it’s warm, there was a police guard outside the door, and it’s a very public place with 24-hour staff presence.  Why leave it? That doesn’t make sense to me.

Also, when Nic Cage says: “Hey, I need to keep this girl at the house overnight tonight because she has no where to go and she is VITAL to the closing this case” – you can’t say “no, she needs to leave.”  Did you not hear what Nic Cage just said??  How does sending the girl off onto the street alone where she only has enemies make any sense?? Yeah, it’s an inconvenience – sure; and, yeah, this case is taking up way too much of Nic Cage’s time and energy than you wanted; and, sure, you were supposed to move a few weeks ago but then this case came up and ruined that plan — I get it: you’re not happy about the inconvenience and stress that this case has presented in your life.  But you had might as well ride it out; you’re already 3/4 of the way through the movie.  The “damage” (if we want to call it that) is already done, why kick the ONLY witness/evidence in the case out of your home to have her get killed or to have the case fall apart?  Then all of that stress and inconvenience was for nothing….and Nic Cage probably separates from you afterwards because you killed his case.  There’s no upside that I can see.

 

Those were the three parts that really annoyed me about this movie.  Otherwise, it was well-done and, even though you know that Cusack’s character is guilty, it is interesting to see how Nic Cage builds the case and uses some creative interrogation tactics in order to get the confession that he needs.  Concluding with, once again, when Nic Cage tells you to do something — you do it.  If he says for you to tell him how you murdered these girls and where their bodies were dumped — you better tell him.

Also, Alaska is kind of a weird place.  This paragraph will be mostly devoted to me sort of making fun of Alaska, so feel free to skip it if you’re not interested in me making fun of our neighboring state to the north.  I know that not all of Alaska is located north enough for the 6 months of sunshine / 6 months of nighttime, but that, I imagine, screws people up.  If I only get a few hours of sleep, I’m cranky; I can’t imagine what psychological damage that environment can do to a person.  Plus, it is one of those “last frontier” places….and that tends to attract deviants and crime (i.e. the American West prior to civilized settlement).  People who abduct, torture, murder, and dispose of bodies in the wilderness would definitely be attracted to Alaska.  Sure, that may happen in the “lower 48″….but I don’t think that the opportunities are as present since the “uninhabitable land”-to-population ratio is much, much, much smaller.   Alaska is also the only state in the Union that pays its residents to live there…. which is something I always pointed out to college friends from Alaska who would talk about how great it is up there (as they elected to leave and not go back).  They pay the people to live there.  I’ve also never been comfortable with the idea of living somewhere that requires that you plug your car in overnight….so that the engine fluids do not freeze.  That’s God’s way of saying: I don’t think that people should live here.

Well, in closing, “The Frozen Ground” was decent – it was a good Netflix movie.  Longer than I expected, considering that the TV crime show wrapped up the case in an hour (with commercials), whereas this movie was a bit longer at 1hr 45mins.  I’d recommend it only if you are a Nic Cage fan or happen to have an interest in bizarre and horrible crimes committed in one of the more obscure states in the Union.  Otherwise, you can probably pass on it and not miss out on too much.

-Ryan.

Movie Thoughts : “Pain & Gain”

 

Wow.  It is difficult for me to rant on “Pain & Gain” simply because nothing horrendous happened in the movie that can get me started.  Actually, I can leave out the “horrendous” adjective and just leave it as: nothing happened.  It was incredibly slow-moving and I didn’t like the characters.

A quick recap: it’s based on a true story (reportedly) where you have a few numbskulls — Marky-Mark, The Rock/Dwayne Johnson, and Papa Doc from “8 Mile” — who decide to turn gangster in a kidnapping and extortion scheme….that, of course, goes awry.  On Netflix, it’s described as a criminal-comedy…but it was certainly not funny.  “Pain & Lame” would have been a more apt title, but it wouldn’t get people into the seats, so I understand the version that they elected to adopt.

This movie was not any good, in my opinion.  The characters were all incredibly annoying — which is unfortunate because I tend to like Marky-Mark movies, and the Rock/Dwayne Johnson I have enjoyed in a few of his movies; I’ve only ever seen Papa Doc in “8 Mile” but no complaints there — I liked it when he said “Let that bitch go first” (it’s a line that I use from time to time when playing volleyball with friends, and the inevitable question of “who serves to start” comes up; it let’s them know that I’m here to play ball).

 Getting back to “Pain & Gain” — there’s not much to say about it aside from what really bothered me, the most, were the characters.  They were annoying; and it feels like a longer movie than it is (run time is 129 mins).  They’re a collection of macho-guys who are really rather wimpy, complain a lot, and, ultimately, are characters that you just want to go away.  Their mistakes and err0rs are blatant to the point that you know what is going to happen later in the movie.  So yeah, it’s not any good and, if you haven’t seen it yet but have seen movies of a similar genre, then you have already seen this movie — trust me.

It’s probably not bad enough to make my Top 10 Worst Movies That I’ve Seen…. but it’s on par with “Spring Breakers” (which was also

Michael Bay is quickly becoming a thorn in my side.  The last time that I saw Michael Bay and smiled was when he was in the Sketchers commercial (where Kenny Powers takes control of Sketchers)….and that has been a few years.

Update:  When expressing my displeasure with the movie on Facebook, one of my friends commented saying that I was being too hard on it, and that, really, the beginning and the end were great — it was just the middle part that sucked.  <sarcasm> So, I suppose, that is a fair point.  </sarcasm>  Anyway, he then sent me the link to the “true story” that the movie was based upon and I realized why the characters were, by and large, really annoying — in reality, there were more than just 3 guys; I believe 5-6, by my count.  And, so, that makes sense.

When you take a storyline that involves 5-6 guys botching a kidnapping/extortion and then boil down their personalities, backgrounds, and follies into 3 GUYS, then, of course, it’s not going to make a lot of sense.  I kept thinking: “Geez, these guys are really, really dumb” — turns out, though, that they were actually upping the dumbness to account for the 2-3 dumb guys that Marky-Mark, the Rock, and Papa Doc assumed…. in addition to their own dumb characters.

Anyway, I continue to bat a pretty high average when it comes to watching a trailer and guessing on whether or not it will be good.  I remember seeing the trailer for this one and not being impressed, and I was right.  It’s on Netflix, right now, so if you haven’t seen it, and want to, at least you’re not going to have to pay theater prices for it, because it definitely is not worth it.

-Ryan.

Movie Thoughts : “Godzilla” (2014)

 

I just got back from seeing “Godzilla” earlier this evening and, first and foremost, I think that it was well done.  Yes, I still brought my bourbon to the show, but it wasn’t a movie that needed alcohol to be enjoyable, I assure you.  I was surprised that Bryan Cranston (who was somewhat heavily featured in the trailer) wasn’t as big of a role as I expected, the kid from Kick-Ass (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) did a pretty good job…even though I didn’t recognize him from his Kick-Ass days.  I also thought that the girl (Elizabeth Olsen) looked like one of the Olsen Twins, and that ate me up throughout most of the movie; and, it turns out, that she is the younger sister of the Olsen Twins, so there ya go.  The acting was solid and I thought that the story was really good — much better than the last rendition of Godzilla (1998) that was in NYC….which also irritates me because Godzilla is supposed to stay in the Pacific; how would a giant monster like Godzilla get all the way to the N. Atlantic???? It makes no sense — and I liked the use of visual effects that you come to expect with movies nowadays.

The only thing that I didn’t like about it is one of my biggest pet peeves, when it comes to this genre of film: military engagement.  Come. On.

In EVERY monster or alien movie, the first response is always to try and shoot it.  Usually with machine guns. Which, are you sitting down?, NEVER works.  And why should it?? The monster is the size of a building….how is an assault rifle going to inflict any notable damage to it??  It is such a simple-minded tactic that it always bothers me.  It’s like Denzel says:

The only thing that the initial (futile) strike ever accomplishes, in these movies, is it angers and annoys me — probably more so than the monster that is destroying the city.  That, or it gives confidence to the invading force of just how silly and ill-equipped we are for the battle.  It is one of my biggest pet peeves in the genre and I wish that, for once, they would make a monster/alien movie where someone tosses out the unlikelihood of that first strike being successful.

Inevitably, the answer then becomes “use bigger weapons” and, sometimes it works, but usually it doesn’t.  The military response is remarkably predictable and you know it is going to fail from the get-go, which is what makes it annoying because, if this was a real event, I imagine (and hope) that they’d be more creative and intelligent with their reaction to the invading force.

For example, in Independence Day, after the initial strikes against the aliens failed (up to and including nuclear warheads) to penetrate their force fields, THEN they figure out: “Oh hey, what if we turn the tables and use their tactics — the commandeering of our satellites — against them by giving the mother ship a virus that then is sent to the ships destroying us down here?” And, ya know what? It worked — we were able to disarm and destroy the mother ship, and level the playing-field on the ground.  It was the confidence-boosting game-changer that then allowed us to do what we probably should have thought about way earlier in the movie:  their “death beam” thing is the ONLY unprotected part of their entire ship, and, thus, the ship’s really only vulnerability.   We should have attacked that point much earlier in the movie (or tried it) but, no, the military-minds were more adherent to the low-percentage-success-rate of trying to shoot it down.  C’mon…it came here from LIGHT YEARS away!! Why would you expect our technology to be able to match theirs one-on-one? It makes no sense.

Anyway, to conclude, I don’t want to say too much about Godzilla, out of fear of spoiling some plot detail, BUT it was a good movie.  I didn’t pay $15 to see it at a real theater*, but for my money, it was a really good movie that I enjoyed and that I recommend.

*I am not really a picky viewer, in terms of IMAX or communal couches (a la Cinetopia) and other such frills like that; just so long as it is a clean theater with comfortable seats, I can make do with a big screen and a better sound system than my place can provide.  Therefore, I am partial to the St. Johns Cinema which is close to my house.  It has the big screen, the better sound system, is conveniently by my place, AND has a $5 matinee and $7 regular admission.  Why pay double elsewhere for the same movie?  That just makes good sense, to me.

-Ryan.

Movie Review: “Stand Up Guys”

“Stand Up Guys” tells the story of two older guys (Pacino & Walken) who were involved in the criminal underworld back in their heyday.  Pacino just got out of jail and Walken, the only buddy that he has left in the world, is tasked with executing him, by another older crime boss who has been holding the grudge against Pacino for a couple of decades — that’s commitment….I’ve only been alive for a few decades, so the concept of holding a grudge for that long seems remarkable to me.  Kudos.

It is full of situational humor revolving around the fact that these guys are now old men — needing Viagra, on an intense regiment of medications/vitamins, and so forth — trying to have one last hurrah before the scheduled execution.  And, for the most part, I enjoyed the humor because I like both of the actors.  It also touches upon the feelings that come from aging: losing people that you care about; family going off and doing their own thing; looking back on past choices and contemplating if they should have been handled differently.  In that respect, it is a touching movie that is probably relatable to older viewers more so than younger viewers – but, as I begin to exit my 20s, I am able to make a quasi-connection with the sentiments being expressed by the characters.  Life is always changing – people and things come and go, which makes those who are important to you, arguably, the most valuable thing in life that you have.

I’m not going to spoil anything about the movie because it becomes pretty obvious, as the story unfolds, how it is going to end – so I don’t need to spoil anything; you’ll be able to figure it out.  I’m not surprised that this movie did not drum up a lot of attention or recognition but that doesn’t mean it isn’t enjoyable. Could it have been better? Certainly. But if you go in with high hopes of this movie being amazing, then you’re bound to be disappointed.  I don’t think that it was made to be amazing; it was made to have fun.  I disagree with some of the bashing and low ratings it has received, but I suppose we all see things in our own way.

In short: I enjoyed watching it but I would not have paid theater price to have seen it.  It was okay.

-Ryan.